Documentation
How we keep it accurate.
Before trusting legal citations to an AI, it's fair to ask how it avoids getting them wrong.
You can report a problem right through the AI
If a result looks wrong, outdated, or irrelevant, just ask the assistant to report it. It logs the right category (gap, inconsistency, factual error, irrelevant result, or coverage gap) along with the query's context. Every report is reviewed by our team, not just a decorative form.
Every citation must be checked, never cited from memory
Behind every answer is a fixed rule: never cite the law from memory, always check the current text first. This matters because the law changes. Brazil's Civil Code monetary-correction rule, for example, changed with Lei 14.905/2024 (arts. 389 and 406), and a model answering purely from memory would cite the old rule.
Validity is checked by default
Searches return only current laws and precedents by default. A repealed law, a vetoed article, or a superseded thesis only show up if you ask for them explicitly, and the full text always comes with its status: current, repealed, vetoed, or superseded.
Binding force is explicit, in three tiers
Every precedent is marked binding (mandatory for all courts, like binding súmulas and repercussão-geral themes), mandatory (strong deference), or persuasive (mere reference). You never have to guess how much weight a ruling carries.
Precedents carry a memory of their relationships
A precedent may have been superseded by a more recent ruling, or an STJ theme may correspond to an STF repercussão-geral case decided later. These relationships come mapped in the results, evaluated as applicable or conditional based on your case's fact date.
Every draft goes through human review
No filing leaves ready to submit. Every draft is a .docx with any pending or unverified point flagged in red, and the licensed attorney reviews it, decides strategy, and signs off before filing.